Conan got a lob toss from “60 Minutes” yesterday and hit it out of the park.
But a review in the TV trades said Conan’s first public media foray backfired a la Tiger.
I don’t think so.
If Tiger had employed a strategy to give up control to the even bigger control freaks at “60 Minutes,” he certainly would be further along the comeback trail instead of still being seen as a villain.
By contrast, Conan gave an honest,heart-felt interview that humanized him, made him sympathetic, and even more likeable. Everyone already thinks Conan got screwed. A “60 Minutes” score just makes it official.
No NBC or Leno perspective in the Steve Kroft story. So it’s totally one-sided which only aids in being pro-Conan. But Conan does have a point. The bean counters had their way and made their decision. It’s all the subsequent talk about the “Tonight Show” losing money that is pure corporate B.S. Conan’s honesty on this subject was compelling. So was his take on hisCatholicism: “If I experience any joy in life, I will go to hell.”
Nice touch also to include his wife, Liza.The “stand by your man” thing is something we haven’t seen in the Conan vs. Jay war. Tiger could have used some of that.
So overall, how can this be anything but a positive for Conan? Even singing “I Will Survive” was funny and to the point.
And the beard is such an improvement, a nice distraction from his frontal red-head wave. I see more man-crushes in COB’s future, especially now that he will be on cable.
As for Leno at the White House Correspondents Dinner: He got titters, but no guffaws. No one was LMAOROFL, in other words. In fact, Leno looked like he could have used cue cards. He was reading his jokes from a script and kept bobbing his head down. It just wasn’t his best. He did have a few good lines, like when he mentioned how diverse the Obama cabinet was with representatives from every ward in Chicago. But many lines fell flat. Really flat.
The president, on the other hand, was pumped up. He was funny. And performed much better than Leno. I liked the line where he described Sarah Palin’s objection to Twitter and Facebook as “socialized media.” But there were other gems. An item on the web said some Daily Show writers contributed. Doesn’t matter. The prez was funnier than Leno.
Overall, a better weekend for Conan.
(A point of disclosure: Like Conan and his “friend,” NBC President Jeff ZuckerConan, I have a similar connection. Conan and I are Lampoon brothers, but the last time I saw him he was in a massive jester outfit and a senior at Harvard. I have photos. He also was too much in character to acknowledge me. I have also taken him to task in the past about some of his tasteless takes on Asian Americans).
I’m surprised that a Harvard grad would not be mindful of what O’Brien did to Leno. Not that I like or watch either of him, but O’Brien did extort NBC into setting a Leno retirement date before Leno was ready to retire. The fact that O’Brien/NBC gave him a long lead time is irrelevant. So that makes O’Brien full of bovine excrement when he claimed he wouldn’t have acted as Leno did in the 2009/10 circumstances.
Hi Yank: I like Leno and actually wrote a few jokes for him about government incompetence and corporate greed back when he was the young upstart looking at Johnny.
What you point out is the sad fact that honorable men sometimes do nasty things when pitted against each other and money is at stake. I think what Conan did to Leno early on was not nice. But I think what NBC did to Conan was not nicer. My initial response was to the question : Did O’Brien acquit himself well in his first public interview since the brouhaha. And I think he did.
Nice severance package. Bottomline – Leno is funny – O’Brien is not – best way to describe O’Brien “humor” is dumb/stupid – which I’m sure appeals to some people — but apparently not enough.